切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (06) : 613 -616. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2015.06.08

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

CEA在评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤退缩中的意义
陈佳艳1, 张弛1, 余静2, 王勇3, 封益飞3, 奚春华3, 陈涛3, 孙新臣1,(), 孙跃明3,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院,放疗科
    2. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院,放射科
    3. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院,结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-15 出版日期:2015-12-25
  • 通信作者: 孙新臣, 孙跃明
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技厅基础研究计划(BK20131448)

The significance of CEA in evaluating the tumor regression after neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for rectal cancer

Jiayan Chen1, Chi Zhang1, Jing Yu2, Yong Wang3, Yifei Feng3, Chunhua Xi3, Tao Chen3, Xinchen Sun1,(), Yueming Sun3,()   

  1. 1. Department of radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
    2. Department of radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
    3. Department of colorectal surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2015-10-15 Published:2015-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Xinchen Sun, Yueming Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Sun Xinchen, Email:
    Sun Yueming, Email:
引用本文:

陈佳艳, 张弛, 余静, 王勇, 封益飞, 奚春华, 陈涛, 孙新臣, 孙跃明. CEA在评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤退缩中的意义[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2015, 04(06): 613-616.

Jiayan Chen, Chi Zhang, Jing Yu, Yong Wang, Yifei Feng, Chunhua Xi, Tao Chen, Xinchen Sun, Yueming Sun. The significance of CEA in evaluating the tumor regression after neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(06): 613-616.

目的

探讨局部晚期直肠癌术前新辅助放化疗疗效的预测因素,以指导直肠癌的个体化治疗。

方法

回顾性分析南京医科大学第一附属医院2014年3月至2015年3月间收治的28例局部进展期直肠癌患者的临床病理资料,利用化学发光法检测新辅助放化疗前、后直肠癌患者血清癌胚抗原(carcino embryonie antigen,CEA)水平,以放化疗后肿瘤TNM分期降期与否和肿瘤消退程度(肿瘤长径)作为同步放化疗疗效的判断标准,分析CEA检测值的变化与直肠癌患者新辅助治疗疗效及预后等临床特征之间的关系。

结果

病理完全缓解组(pathologic complete response,pCR)组与非pCR组患者,CEA的水平在新辅助治疗前后无统计学差异(p=0.069),新辅助治疗后,CEA的下降程度在两组中未见差异(p=0.827)。经新辅助治疗后肿瘤长径退缩显著组,CEA下降程度也较显著,CEA下降≥50%组内,新辅助治疗后肿瘤长径退缩≥25%的患者占70.6%,CEA下降<50%组内,此部分患者仅占54.6%。

结论

新辅助放化疗后CEA明显下降的患者其肿瘤退缩更显著,提示CEA可能作为一项直观的评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗的疗效指标。

Objective

To investigate the predictive factors of neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, and to guide the treatment of rectal cancer.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 28 locally advanced rectal cancer patients admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from March 2014 to March 2015, with clinical and pathological data. The serum CEA level was detected by chemical luminescent assay, before and after neo-adjuvant therapy. The down-staging of tumor TNM stage and regression of tumor length were analyzed by postoperative pathology and MRI. The relationship between CEA levels and the effect of neo-adjuvant treatment were assessed.

Results

There was no significance in the level of CEA difference between pCR group and non-pCR group before or after neo-adjuvant therapy (p=0.827). After neo-adjuvant therapy, more significant tumor regression (≥25%) was observed in patients that CEA decreased≥50%, amount for 70.6%, while the percentage was only accounted for 54.6% in patients that CEA decreased<50%.

Conclusions

CEA decreased significantly in patients with a greater degree of tumor regression after neo-adjuvant therapy, we can obtain more intuitive assessment of neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy efficacy in rectal cancer, especially in the tumor regression.

表1 pCR组与Non-pCR组在新辅助治疗前后CEA水平的变化表(±s,ng/L)
表2 血清CEA水平及下降程度与新辅助后pCR的关系表
表3 肿瘤退缩程度与新辅助治疗后CEA下降程度关系表(例)
[1]
Herb Brody. Colorectal cancer. Nature, 2015, 521(7551): S1.
[2]
裴海平,裴谦,伍韶斌,等.直肠癌术前个体化同步放化疗敏感性研究.中华胃肠外科杂志, 2014: 17(6): 565-568.
[3]
于滨,于跃明.直肠癌新辅助放疗中CEA的检测意义.河北医药, 2010, 32(6): 651-652.
[4]
Garland ML, Vather R, Bunkley N, et al. Clinical tumour size and nodal status predict pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(3): 301-307.
[5]
Song S, Hong JC, McDonnell SE, et al. Combined modality therapy for rectal cancer: the relative value of posttreatment versus pretreatment CEA as a prognostic marker for disease recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(8): 2471-2476.
[6]
Park YA, Sohn SK, Seong J, et a1. Serum CEA as a predictor for the response to preoperative ehemomdiation in rectal cancer. J Surg Oneol, 2006, 93(2): 145-150.
[7]
Yoon SM, Kim DY, Kim Till, et a1. Clinical parameters predicting pathologic tumor response after preoperative ehemoradiotherapy for rectal cantor. Int J Radiat Oncol Bid Phys, 2007, 69(4): 1167-1172.
[1] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[2] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[7] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[8] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[9] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[10] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[11] 吴晨瑞, 廖锐, 贺强, 潘龙, 黄平, 曹洪祥, 赵益, 王永琛, 黄俊杰, 孙睿锐. MDT模式下肝动脉灌注化疗联合免疫靶向治疗肝细胞癌多处转移一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 713-716.
[12] 陆志峰, 周佳佳, 梁舒. 虚拟现实技术在治疗弱视中的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 891-895.
[13] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[14] 岳瑞雪, 孔令欣, 郝鑫, 杨进强, 韩猛, 崔国忠, 王建军, 张志生, 孔凡庭, 张维, 何文博, 李现桥, 周新平, 徐东宏, 胡崇珠. 乳腺癌HER2蛋白表达水平预测新辅助治疗疗效的真实世界研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 765-770.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要