切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (06) : 613 -616. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2015.06.08

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

CEA在评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤退缩中的意义
陈佳艳1, 张弛1, 余静2, 王勇3, 封益飞3, 奚春华3, 陈涛3, 孙新臣1,(), 孙跃明3,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院,放疗科
    2. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院,放射科
    3. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院,结直肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-15 出版日期:2015-12-25
  • 通信作者: 孙新臣, 孙跃明
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技厅基础研究计划(BK20131448)

The significance of CEA in evaluating the tumor regression after neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for rectal cancer

Jiayan Chen1, Chi Zhang1, Jing Yu2, Yong Wang3, Yifei Feng3, Chunhua Xi3, Tao Chen3, Xinchen Sun1,(), Yueming Sun3,()   

  1. 1. Department of radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
    2. Department of radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
    3. Department of colorectal surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2015-10-15 Published:2015-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Xinchen Sun, Yueming Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Sun Xinchen, Email:
    Sun Yueming, Email:
引用本文:

陈佳艳, 张弛, 余静, 王勇, 封益飞, 奚春华, 陈涛, 孙新臣, 孙跃明. CEA在评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤退缩中的意义[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2015, 04(06): 613-616.

Jiayan Chen, Chi Zhang, Jing Yu, Yong Wang, Yifei Feng, Chunhua Xi, Tao Chen, Xinchen Sun, Yueming Sun. The significance of CEA in evaluating the tumor regression after neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(06): 613-616.

目的

探讨局部晚期直肠癌术前新辅助放化疗疗效的预测因素,以指导直肠癌的个体化治疗。

方法

回顾性分析南京医科大学第一附属医院2014年3月至2015年3月间收治的28例局部进展期直肠癌患者的临床病理资料,利用化学发光法检测新辅助放化疗前、后直肠癌患者血清癌胚抗原(carcino embryonie antigen,CEA)水平,以放化疗后肿瘤TNM分期降期与否和肿瘤消退程度(肿瘤长径)作为同步放化疗疗效的判断标准,分析CEA检测值的变化与直肠癌患者新辅助治疗疗效及预后等临床特征之间的关系。

结果

病理完全缓解组(pathologic complete response,pCR)组与非pCR组患者,CEA的水平在新辅助治疗前后无统计学差异(p=0.069),新辅助治疗后,CEA的下降程度在两组中未见差异(p=0.827)。经新辅助治疗后肿瘤长径退缩显著组,CEA下降程度也较显著,CEA下降≥50%组内,新辅助治疗后肿瘤长径退缩≥25%的患者占70.6%,CEA下降<50%组内,此部分患者仅占54.6%。

结论

新辅助放化疗后CEA明显下降的患者其肿瘤退缩更显著,提示CEA可能作为一项直观的评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗的疗效指标。

Objective

To investigate the predictive factors of neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, and to guide the treatment of rectal cancer.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 28 locally advanced rectal cancer patients admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from March 2014 to March 2015, with clinical and pathological data. The serum CEA level was detected by chemical luminescent assay, before and after neo-adjuvant therapy. The down-staging of tumor TNM stage and regression of tumor length were analyzed by postoperative pathology and MRI. The relationship between CEA levels and the effect of neo-adjuvant treatment were assessed.

Results

There was no significance in the level of CEA difference between pCR group and non-pCR group before or after neo-adjuvant therapy (p=0.827). After neo-adjuvant therapy, more significant tumor regression (≥25%) was observed in patients that CEA decreased≥50%, amount for 70.6%, while the percentage was only accounted for 54.6% in patients that CEA decreased<50%.

Conclusions

CEA decreased significantly in patients with a greater degree of tumor regression after neo-adjuvant therapy, we can obtain more intuitive assessment of neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy efficacy in rectal cancer, especially in the tumor regression.

表1 pCR组与Non-pCR组在新辅助治疗前后CEA水平的变化表(±s,ng/L)
表2 血清CEA水平及下降程度与新辅助后pCR的关系表
表3 肿瘤退缩程度与新辅助治疗后CEA下降程度关系表(例)
[1]
Herb Brody. Colorectal cancer. Nature, 2015, 521(7551): S1.
[2]
裴海平,裴谦,伍韶斌,等.直肠癌术前个体化同步放化疗敏感性研究.中华胃肠外科杂志, 2014: 17(6): 565-568.
[3]
于滨,于跃明.直肠癌新辅助放疗中CEA的检测意义.河北医药, 2010, 32(6): 651-652.
[4]
Garland ML, Vather R, Bunkley N, et al. Clinical tumour size and nodal status predict pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(3): 301-307.
[5]
Song S, Hong JC, McDonnell SE, et al. Combined modality therapy for rectal cancer: the relative value of posttreatment versus pretreatment CEA as a prognostic marker for disease recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(8): 2471-2476.
[6]
Park YA, Sohn SK, Seong J, et a1. Serum CEA as a predictor for the response to preoperative ehemomdiation in rectal cancer. J Surg Oneol, 2006, 93(2): 145-150.
[7]
Yoon SM, Kim DY, Kim Till, et a1. Clinical parameters predicting pathologic tumor response after preoperative ehemoradiotherapy for rectal cantor. Int J Radiat Oncol Bid Phys, 2007, 69(4): 1167-1172.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[9] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[10] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[11] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[12] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[13] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[14] 张平骥, 徐钰, 李天水, 庞文翼, 符师宁, 张梦圆. 重症患者镇静治疗现状及期望的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 562-567.
[15] 王昌前, 林婷婷, 宁雨露, 王颖杰, 谭文勇. 光免疫治疗在肿瘤领域的临床应用新进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 575-583.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?