切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 272 -274. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2015.03.10

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

达芬奇机器人在超低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用
曾冬竹1, 张超1, 唐波1, 甘露1, 陈华1, 雷晓1, 罗华星1, 兰远志1, 余佩武1,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,第三军医大学西南医院全军普通外科中心 微创胃肠外科中心
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-23 出版日期:2015-06-25
  • 通信作者: 余佩武

The application of Da Vinci robotic surgical system in anus preserving operation of ultra low rectal cancers

Dong-zhu ZENG1, Chao ZHANG1, Bo TANG1, Lu GAN1, Hua CHEN1, Xiao LEI1, Hua-xing LUO1, Yuan-zhi LAN1, Pei-wu YU1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery and Center of Minimal Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery Southwest Hospital, PLA General Surgery Center, The Third Military Medical University
  • Received:2015-04-23 Published:2015-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Pei-wu YU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: YU Pei-wu, Email:
引用本文:

曾冬竹, 张超, 唐波, 甘露, 陈华, 雷晓, 罗华星, 兰远志, 余佩武. 达芬奇机器人在超低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2015, 04(03): 272-274.

Dong-zhu ZENG, Chao ZHANG, Bo TANG, Lu GAN, Hua CHEN, Xiao LEI, Hua-xing LUO, Yuan-zhi LAN, Pei-wu YU. The application of Da Vinci robotic surgical system in anus preserving operation of ultra low rectal cancers[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(03): 272-274.

目的

探讨达芬奇机器人手术系统在超低位直肠癌保肛手术中的作用。

方法

回顾分析第三军医大学西南医院于2010年3月至2014年6月应用达芬奇机器人手术系统完成52例超低位直肠癌前切除手术患者的临床资料。对患者的一般资料、手术情况、并发症的发生、术后恢复及病理性资料进行分析评估。

结果

52例患者均顺利完成前切除保肛手术,无中转开腹;手术时间193.7±43.2 min,术中出血量65.5±29.3 ml。淋巴结清扫18.2±5.6枚。远切缘距肿瘤2.4±0.2 cm、无癌细胞残留。术后并发症发生率为13.5%(7/52),其中吻合口瘘5例、肺部感染1例,尿潴留1例,无死亡病例。

结论

达芬奇机器人手术系统在超低位直肠癌的前切除保肛手术中操作简便安全、创伤小、术后恢复快。

Objective

To explore the application of Da Vinci robotic surgical system in anus preserving operation of ultra low rectal cancers.

Methods

Systematically review the 52 patients who underwent the ultra low APR with the Da Vinci robotic surgical system.The general situation, operations, complications, recovery and pathological feature were analyzed.

Results

All the 52 patients went through the operation successfully with no conversion, and their anus were preserved.The average operation time was 193.7±43.2 mins.The blood loss wsa 65.5±29.3 ml.The average number of harvested lymph nodes was 18.2±5.6.The average distance to tumor is 2.4±0.2cm without cancer cell residuing.The post operation complication ratio is 13.5%(7 in 52), in which 5 cases developed anomostosis leakage, 1 case pulmonary infection and 1 case urine retention.

Conclusion

The Da Vinci robotic surgical system in anus preserving operation of ultra low rectal cancers is convenient, safe, with fast recover and small trauma.

表1 患者手术及术后情况表
[1]
deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Ricci J, et al.A comparison of open and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma.Dis Colon Rectum, 2011, 54: 275-282.
[2]
Bianchi PP, Petz W, Luca F, et al.Laparoscopic and robotic total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.Brief review and personal remarks.Front Oncol, 2014, 4: 98.
[3]
Ielpo B, Caruso R, Quijano Y, et al.Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.Int J Med Robot, 2014, 10(3): 300-305.
[4]
曾冬竹,石彦,雷晓,等.达芬奇机器人手术系统应用于直肠癌根治术101例的近期疗效观察.中华胃肠外科杂志,2013,16(5): 451-454.
[5]
Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, et al.Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Annals of surgery, 2013, 257: 672-678.
[6]
Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, et al.A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.Annals of surgical oncology, 2012, 19: 2485-2493.
[7]
Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, et al.Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients.Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29: 1105-1111.
[8]
Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, et al.Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy.Surg Endosc, 2013, 27: 48-55.
[9]
Baik SH, Kim NK, Lim DR, et al.Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20: 2625-2632.
[1] 李友, 唐林峰, 杜伟伟, 刘海亮, 余新水, 沈佳宇, 巨积辉. 皮瓣联合掌长肌腱折叠单排三点式固定治疗指背侧创面伴锤状指畸形的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 485-490.
[2] 刘敏, 唐恩溢, 刘喆, 葛苏蒙, 刘梅, 孙国文. 计算机导航技术在口腔颌面部微小异物取出手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 375-379.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[5] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[9] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[10] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[11] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[12] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
[13] 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 肝外伤破裂患者治疗后胆漏发生影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 836-840.
[14] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[15] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要