腹腔镜右半结肠癌CME与D3根治质量对照研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2014.04.08

目的

比较腹腔镜下CME与开腹D3根治在右半结肠癌根治中外科肿瘤学质量。

方法

选取山西省人民医院2010年2月至2013年10月间收治的右半结肠腺癌患者共87例，前瞻性非随机实施腹腔镜全系膜切除术(Laparoscopic complete mesocolon excision，L-CME，n＝45)和同期开腹D3根治术(Laparotomy D3 resection，L-D3R，n＝42)，根据术中外科平面和结肠标本量化评估外科质量。

结果

L-CME组外科平面分级略高于D3组但统计学差异不显著(84.4%v73.8%，P>0.05)，但获取淋巴结(28.73v24.43，P<0.01)，切除系膜面积(14592.49v10953.42mm²，P<0.01)及结肠切除(24.33v18.33cm，P<0.01)均高于D3组。

结论

两种手术都有较好系膜切除平面，但L-CME更符合系膜平面解剖学特点，从而提高了外科质量参数。

关键词: 腹腔镜, 结直肠肿瘤, 淋巴结切除术, 全结肠系膜切除, 外科质量

Objective

To compare the surgical quality betweenlaparoscopic complete mesocolon excision and open D3 lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 87 patients with right-sided colon adenocarcinoma who underwent either L-CME(45cases)or open D3 lymphadenectomy(42cases)from February 2010 to October 2013 were collected .The surgical quality of anatomic planes and completeness of excised mesocolon were assessed through the surgical specimens obtained.

Results

L-CME was slightly higher but not significant in mesocolic plane dissection rate(84.4%vs 73.8%, P>0.05). L-CME removed longer bowel(24.33 cm vs 18.33cm, P<0.01), more mesocolon(14592.49mm²vs 10953.42mm², P<0.01)and more lymph nodes(28.73vs 24.43, P<0.01). The distancefrom artery ligationsite to closest intestinal wall or tumor in L-CMEgroupwas significantly longer(89.69 mm vs 79.55 mm, P<0.01; 111.82 mm vs 102.31mm, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Bothsurgical methods showed good mesocolic plane dissection rate.But L-CME increased the completeness of mesocolon excised andquality of lymphadenectomy.L-CME was surgically superior to D3 lymphadenectomyand might be a standard procedure for colon cancer.

Key words: Laparoscopy, Colorectal neoplasms, Lymph node excision, Complete mesocolon excision, Surgical quality

表1 患者基本资料比较表

分组(Total＝87)		L-CME(n＝45)	L-D3R(n＝42)	t	P
年龄(year)		57.84±9.148	60.60±9.061	1.40	0.163
BMI(Kg/m²)		20.68±1.94	20.75±2.256	0.17	0.865
手术时间(min)		151.977±39.19	164.809±38.39	1.54	0.127
失血量(ml)		149.55±95.87	86.666±71.41	56.20	0.049
性别		?	?	?	?
?	女	26(57.8%)	23(54.8%)	?	?
?	男	19(42.2%)	19(45.2%)	49(56.3%)38(43.7%)	0.080
cTNM-stage		45(100%)	42(100%)	87(100%)	?
?	I	8(17.8%)	5(11.9%)	13(14.9%)	?
?	II	5(11.1%)	7(16.7%)	12(13.8%)	0.610
?	III	32(71.1%)	30(71.4%)	62(71.3%)	?

表1 患者基本资料比较表

分组(Total＝87)		L-CME(n＝45)	L-D3R(n＝42)	t	P
年龄(year)		57.84±9.148	60.60±9.061	1.40	0.163
BMI(Kg/m²)		20.68±1.94	20.75±2.256	0.17	0.865
手术时间(min)		151.977±39.19	164.809±38.39	1.54	0.127
失血量(ml)		149.55±95.87	86.666±71.41	56.20	0.049
性别		?	?	?	?
?	女	26(57.8%)	23(54.8%)	?	?
?	男	19(42.2%)	19(45.2%)	49(56.3%)38(43.7%)	0.080
cTNM-stage		45(100%)	42(100%)	87(100%)	?
?	I	8(17.8%)	5(11.9%)	13(14.9%)	?
?	II	5(11.1%)	7(16.7%)	12(13.8%)	0.610
?	III	32(71.1%)	30(71.4%)	62(71.3%)	?

图1 腹腔镜下全结肠系膜切除术外科质量控制相关因素图像

图2 L-CME组与L-D3R组结肠系膜质量分级及标准量化比较柱状图

表2 结肠系膜平面质量分级比较表

组别	MMP	IMP	MCP	Total
L-D3R	2(4.8%)	9(21.4%)	31(73.8%)	42(48.3%)
L-CME	3(6.7%)	4(8.9%)	38(84.4%)	45(51.7%)
Total	5(5.7%)	13(14.9%)	69(79.3%)	P＝0.255

表2 结肠系膜平面质量分级比较表

组别	MMP	IMP	MCP	Total
L-D3R	2(4.8%)	9(21.4%)	31(73.8%)	42(48.3%)
L-CME	3(6.7%)	4(8.9%)	38(84.4%)	45(51.7%)
Total	5(5.7%)	13(14.9%)	69(79.3%)	P＝0.255

表3 两组外科质量比较

GPMD	L-D3R			L-CME
GPMD	MPP	IMP	MCP	MPP	IMP	MCP
MA	6954.00	8216.67	12006.16	9670.00	11198.00	15764.74
SD	832.97	844.61	2310.88	836.15	783.62	2182.01
L-total	10953.42±2706.23			14952.49±2798.43
?	F＝45.79，P＝0.000
LNs	15.00	18.78	21.26	19.00	26.25	29.76
SD	1.40	1.20	4.19	2.00	2.22	4.60
L-total	20.43±3.97			28.73±5.12
?	F＝70.71，P＝0.000
PD	10.00	14.44	20.00	17.67	19.00	25.42
SD	0.00	1.42	4.22	0.58	0.82	3.91
L-total	18.33±4.71			24.33±4.42
?	F＝37.53，P＝0.000
AI	77.50	72.22	81.81	74.00	76.75	92.29
SD	3.54	8.30	9.98	11.53	7.09	7.78
L-total	79.55±10.13			89.69±9.91
?	F＝22.29，P＝0.000
AT	91.50	100.00	103.58	102.33	96.00	114.24
SD	4.95	12.26	12.52	21.22	10.55	12.18
L-total	102.31±12.34			111.82±13.67
?	F＝11.55，P＝0.001

表3 两组外科质量比较

GPMD	L-D3R			L-CME
GPMD	MPP	IMP	MCP	MPP	IMP	MCP
MA	6954.00	8216.67	12006.16	9670.00	11198.00	15764.74
SD	832.97	844.61	2310.88	836.15	783.62	2182.01
L-total	10953.42±2706.23			14952.49±2798.43
?	F＝45.79，P＝0.000
LNs	15.00	18.78	21.26	19.00	26.25	29.76
SD	1.40	1.20	4.19	2.00	2.22	4.60
L-total	20.43±3.97			28.73±5.12
?	F＝70.71，P＝0.000
PD	10.00	14.44	20.00	17.67	19.00	25.42
SD	0.00	1.42	4.22	0.58	0.82	3.91
L-total	18.33±4.71			24.33±4.42
?	F＝37.53，P＝0.000
AI	77.50	72.22	81.81	74.00	76.75	92.29
SD	3.54	8.30	9.98	11.53	7.09	7.78
L-total	79.55±10.13			89.69±9.91
?	F＝22.29，P＝0.000
AT	91.50	100.00	103.58	102.33	96.00	114.24
SD	4.95	12.26	12.52	21.22	10.55	12.18
L-total	102.31±12.34			111.82±13.67
?	F＝11.55，P＝0.001

[1]	Hohenberger W,Weber K,Matzel K, et al.Standardized surgery for colonic cancer：complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome.Colorectal Disease, 2009, 11(4): 354-364.
[2]	West NP,Hohenberger W,Weber K, et al.Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon.J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(2): 272-278.
[3]	West NP,Kobayashi H,Takahashi K, et al.Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery：comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation.J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(15): 1763-1769.
[4]	Watanabe T,Itabashi M,Shimada Y, et al.Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum(JSCCR)guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.Int J Clin Oncol, 2012, 17(1): 1-29.
[5]	Feng B,Sun J,Ling T L, et al.Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision(CME)with medial access for right-hemi colon cancer：feasibility and technical strategies.Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(12): 3669-3675.
[6]	Li GX,Zhao LY.Standard procedure for colon cancer resection：complete mesocolic excision.Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2012, 15(1): 14-16.
[7]	West NP,Morris EJ,Rotimi O, et al.Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival：a retrospective observational study.Lancet Oncol, 2008, 9(9): 857-865.
[8]	Bertelsen CA,Bols B,Ingeholm P, et al.Can the quality of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision? Colorectal Dis, 2011, 13(10): 1123-1129.
[9]	Galizia G,Lieto E,De Vita F, et al.Is complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers? A prospective study.Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(1): 89-97.
[10]	Gao Z,Ye Y,Zhang W, et al.An anatomical, histopathological, and molecular biological function study of the fascias posterior to the interperitoneal colon and its associated mesocolon：their relevance to colonic surgery.J Anat, 2013, 223(2): 123-132.
[11]	Mike M,Kano N. Reappraisal of the Vascular Anatomy of the Colon and Consequences for the Definition of Surgical Resection.Dig Surg, 2013, 30(4-5): 383-392.

[1]	代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2]	王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[3]	曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[4]	杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5]	周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6]	唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[7]	张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[8]	张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[9]	王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[10]	李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[11]	甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[12]	逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[13]	燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[14]	李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[15]	刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Comparison of surgical quality between complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon cancer

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Comparison of surgical quality between complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon cancer