Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02): 144-148. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2021.02.006

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The application value of measuring the distance between the sacral promontory to the rectal stump in accurate anastomosis of laparoscopic radical rectal cancer resection

Bobo Zheng1, Yaqi Qu1, Song Zhang1, Yumin Yue1, Hao She1, Guangzhu Wang1, Shengpu Dong1, Jian Qiu1,(), Xiaoqiang Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shannxi Province People's Hospital, Xi'an 710068, China
  • Received:2020-11-16 Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-05-07
  • Contact: Jian Qiu

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the value of intraoperative accurate measurement of the distance from the distal rectal edge to the promontory of the sacrum(Drp) in accurate anastomosis of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with low-middle rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery who were admitted to General Surgery Department of Shannxi Provincial People's Hospital from January 1, 2019 to October 1, 2020 were included. Clinical data were collected and surgical videos were reviewed. Intraoperative measurement was performed as follows: Line segment was used to measure the Drp; The left semicolon and its mesangium were stretched at the level of the promonium of the sacrum and A titanium clip was used to mark the corresponding colon as point A; Starting from point A, the original Drp line segment was used to measure the proximal resection line of rectal cancer from point A to Drp+3 cm. Colorectal end-to-end anastomosis was performed, and enteral decompression was performed through anal indwelling anal canal. Patients underwent terminal ileostomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The evaluation indexes include intraoperative, postoperative and specimen quality. Descriptive statistical methods were used in this study.

Results

The operative time was (247±57)min, and the intraoperative blood loss was estimated at (35±15)mL. The splenic flexure of the colon was mobilized before anastomosis in 7 cases. There were no cases of pelvic colon "bridging" after anastomosis, and the pelvic colon was relaxed after anastomosis through the anterior sacral area. There were no cases of free proximal colon after anastomosis and the mesangium was trimmed again. The Drp (17.7±4.6) cm, the distance from the proximal resection margin was (16.4±3.2) cm, and the distance from the distal resection margin was (2.3±1.1) cm. The specimen quality of total rectal mesorectal resection was grade A. There were no positive cases at the distal resection margin of rectal cancer. There was no anastomotic leakage after surgery. One patient had anastomotic bleeding. Exhaust time was (3.1±1.2) d, defecation time was (3.4±1.6) d, and postoperative hospitalization time was (9.1±2.3) d.

Conclusion

Measuring the Drp can accurately determine the proximal colon length and promote accurate anastomosis in laparoscopic radical rectal resection.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Sacral promontory, Rectal stump, Distance, Anastomosis

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-010-87788026 E-mail: cjcd_editor@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd