Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04): 323-327. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2016.04.009

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction on short-term outcomes and cellular immunity for colorectal cancer

Junjie Hu1, Shao zhong Wei1, Zhiguo Xiong1,(), Bojun Yang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hubei Colorectal Cancer Clinical Research Center, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2016-04-23 Online:2016-08-25 Published:2016-08-25
  • Contact: Zhiguo Xiong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xiong Zhiguo, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) on short-term outcomes and cellular immunity for colorectal cancer.

Methods

From September 2014 to March 2016, data of 89 colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic resection were reviewed. All included thirty-one patients underwent laparoscopic resection with NOSE (NOSE group), and fifty-eight patients underwent traditional laparoscopic-assisted resection (LAP group). Short-term outcomes and cellular immunity of the patients in the two groups were compared.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar (P>0.05). The two groups did not differ in operating time, perioperative complications and the number of lymph node harvest (P>0.05). Pain score after operation in the NOSE group (2.8±0.9) was significantly lower than those in the LAP group (3.7±1.2) (t=3.766, P<0.001). Times to first flatus were 2.6±0.8 days and 3.3±0.8 days in NOSE group and LAP group, respectively (t=4.427, P<0.001). Postoperative hospital stay in NOSE group were 7.8±4.3 days and 10.3±5.4 days in LAP group, (t=2.213, P=0.030). CD4+ T cell counts on the 3rd day after operation were significantly lower than those on the day before operation in both groups,and there were significant differences in CD4+ T cell counts on the 3rd day after operation between two groups (t=4.017, P=0.002). CD8+ T cell counts and CD4+ /CD8+ were significantly lower than those on the day before operation in LAP group(P<0.05) but not in NOSE group (P>0.05). CRP level was significantly higher after surgery in both group(P<0.05), and CRP level in the LAP group was significantly higher than that of the NOSE group on the 3rd and the 6th day after surgery (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional laparoscopic-assisted resection, NOSE has better effect of minimally invasive and smaller effect on cellular immunity for colorectal cancer.

Key words: Colorectal neoplasms, Laparoscopes, NOSE, Cellular immunity

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-010-87788026 E-mail: cjcd_editor@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd