Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03): 220-225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2022.03.006

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the influencing factors of the failure of NOSES for colorectal cancer

Xingwang Li1, Hang Wu1, Junhong Hu2,(), Yugui Lian2, Kunkun Xia2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng 475000, China
    2. Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
  • Received:2021-11-20 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-25
  • Contact: Junhong Hu

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the influencing factors of the failure of NOSES for sigmoid cancer and rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted. Clinical data of 315 cases of sigmoid and rectal cancer patients undergoing trial NOSES in the colorectal surgery department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Huaihe Hospital of He'nan University from January 2017 to March 2021, including preoperative examination, surgical process and surgical results. Univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression model were used to analyze the influencing factors leading to surgical difficulty.

Results

Among the 315 patients included, 200 were males and 115 were females. The age was (61±13) years old, and the median size of the largest tumor was 3.6 (P25, P75: 2.8, 4.8) cm. Among them, 223 cases (70.8%) had difficulty in removing specimens by NOSES. Univariate analysis showed that BMI>25.0 kg/m2 (χ2=5.987, P=0.014), tumor obstruction (χ2=9.170, P=0.002), tumor distance from anal edge>5.0 cm (χ2=5.275, P=0.022), tumor maximum diameter>5.0 cm (χ2=5.735, P=0.017), the anterior and posterior diameter of the mesorectal>6.0 cm (χ2=7.708, P=0.005), and the learning curve of the surgeon ≤50 cases (χ2=5.013, P=0.025) were associated with the difficulty of NOSES (all P<0.05). Age, sex and history of abdominal surgery were not associated with the difficulty of NOSES (all P>0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that BMI>25.0 kg/m2, tumor obstruction, tumor distance from the anus to>5.0 cm, tumor maximum diameter>5.0 cm, mesorectal diameter>6.0cm, and learning curve ≤50 cases were independent influencing factors for NOSES difficulty (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Preoperative evaluation of BMI, tumor distance from anal margin, tumor obstruction, tumor maximum diameter and mesorectal anteroposterior diameter is helpful for selecting suitable sigmoid colon and rectal cancer patients for NOSES.

Key words: Sigmoid neoplasms, Rectal neoplasms, Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES)

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0086-010-87788026 E-mail: cjcd_editor@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd