Efficacy comparison of two treatment methods for stoma granuloma

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2019.02.020

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To observe the efficacies outcomes of stoma granuloma using the treatment methods of silver nitrate and electrocautery at our stoma clinic.

Methods

A total of 52 outpatients with stoma granuloma were randomly assigned into two groups of silver nitrate and electrocautery. Their efficacies were observed and analyzed.

Results

The comparison of the curative effects about two treatment methods showed no statistically significant difference (Z=1.646, P=0.100). Regression analysis of effective rate demonstrated that electrocautery was more efficacious than silver nitrate.

Conclusion

These two treatment methods are both effective for stoma granuloma. The appropriate treatment can be chosen according to the size of granuloma and the convenience of the return visit, to achieved satisfactory results.

Key words: Granuloma, Stoma, Silver nitrate, Electrocautery, Efficacies

Jinling Dong, Honglian Xu, Qun Qiu, Guifen Lvy. Efficacy comparison of two treatment methods for stoma granuloma[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(02): 195-197.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhjzcjbdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2019.02.020

https://zhjzcjbdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V08/I02/195

Figures/Tables 3

References 8

[1]	Saidha S, Sotirchos ES, Eckstein C. Etiology of sareoidosis: doesinfection play a role? [J]. Yale J Biol Med, 2012, 85(1):133-141.
[2]	McGrath A. Overcoming the challenges of overgranulation [J].Wounds UK, 2011, 7(1):42-49.
[3]	Williams J. Considerations for managing stoma complications in the community [J]. Br J Comm Nure, 2012, 17(6):266-226.
[4]	吴亚芬，李巍，钱华, 等. 儿童化脓性肉芽肿3种治疗方法疗效比较[J]. 中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志, 2013, 12(4):250-252.
[5]	Carolyn Swash.Pouching for an ostoma patient with granulomas [J].WCET Journal, 2013, 33(2):35-36.
[6]	张玉姬，鲁朝敏，徐洪莲, 等. 高频电治疗造口黏膜肉芽肿的护理[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2015, 32(7):681-682.
[7]	Persson E, Berndtsson I, Carlsson E, et al. Stoma-related complications and stoma size-a 2-year follow up [J]. Colorectal Disease, 2010, 12(10):971-976.
[8]	Suzie Dukes, Claire Lowther, Tessa Martin, et al. Guidelines for treating stoma granulomas at the mucocutaneous junction [J]. Gastrointestinal Nursing, 2010, 8(1):16-21.

组别	例数	平均年龄（岁）	性别（例）男/女	造口种类（例）结肠造口回肠造口尿路造口			肉芽肿平均面积	平均肉芽肿数
硝酸银组	26	61.58±13.87	17/9	20	2	4	0.40±0.34	2.69±1.64
电灼组	26	59.50±9.12	20/6	23	1	2	0.34±0.23	2.38±1.44
检验值	?	t=0.638	χ²=0.843	?			t=1.097	t=-0.717
P值	?	0.527	0.358	0.555^*			0.275	0.477

组别	例数	平均年龄（岁）	性别（例）男/女	造口种类（例）结肠造口回肠造口尿路造口			肉芽肿平均面积	平均肉芽肿数
硝酸银组	26	61.58±13.87	17/9	20	2	4	0.40±0.34	2.69±1.64
电灼组	26	59.50±9.12	20/6	23	1	2	0.34±0.23	2.38±1.44
检验值	?	t=0.638	χ²=0.843	?			t=1.097	t=-0.717
P值	?	0.527	0.358	0.555^*			0.275	0.477

组别	例数	痊愈	显效	好转	无效	合计
硝酸银组	26	10（38.46）	8（30.77）	8（30.77）	0	26
电灼组	26	13（50.00）	12（46.00）	1（3.85）	0	26
Z值	?	?	?	?	?	-1.646
P值	?	?	?	?	?	0.100

组别	例数	痊愈	显效	好转	无效	合计
硝酸银组	26	10（38.46）	8（30.77）	8（30.77）	0	26
电灼组	26	13（50.00）	12（46.00）	1（3.85）	0	26
Z值	?	?	?	?	?	-1.646
P值	?	?	?	?	?	0.100

?	回归系数	标准误	Wals	P值	OR值	OR值的95%可信区间
?	回归系数	标准误	Wals	P值	OR值	下限	上限
分组	2.408	1.105	4.750	0.029	11.111	1.275	96.862
常量	-1.597	1.327	1.447	0.229	0.203	?	?

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export