切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 131 -136. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2020.02.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

中低位直肠癌腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术难易程度的骨盆影像学因素分析
陈俊辑1, 曾子威1, 谢佩怡2, 张兴伟3, 罗双灵3, 康亮3,()   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,广东省胃肠病学研究所,广东省重点实验室
    2. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院放射科
    3. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院结直肠外科 国家重点专科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-25 出版日期:2020-04-25
  • 通信作者: 康亮
  • 基金资助:
    中山大学医学临床研究5010计划项目(No.2016005); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No.16ykjc25)

Evaluation of pelvic factors affecting the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectum excision for middle and low rectal cancer

Junji Chen1, Ziwei Zeng1, Peiyi Xie2, Xingwei Zhang3, Shuangling Luo3, Liang Kang3,()   

  1. 1. Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Key Laboratory, Guangzhou 510655, China
    2. Department of Radiology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
    3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2019-07-25 Published:2020-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Liang Kang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Kang Liang, Email:
引用本文:

陈俊辑, 曾子威, 谢佩怡, 张兴伟, 罗双灵, 康亮. 中低位直肠癌腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术难易程度的骨盆影像学因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(02): 131-136.

Junji Chen, Ziwei Zeng, Peiyi Xie, Xingwei Zhang, Shuangling Luo, Liang Kang. Evaluation of pelvic factors affecting the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectum excision for middle and low rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(02): 131-136.

目的

通过测量中低位直肠癌骨盆CT扫描图像数据,探讨影响腹腔镜全直肠系膜术难易程度的影像学因素。

方法

回顾性分析92例在2016年4月至2018年5月接受腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除的中低位直肠癌患者的临床资料。在薄层CT扫描冠状位、矢状位和横断面图像上测得10项骨盆因素数据。收集患者临床相关资料,以手术时间、术中失血量、术后住院天数及术后并发症作为评价手术难易程度的指标。采用单因素分析和多因素分析评估骨盆相关数据对手术难易程度的影响。

结果

92例患者平均手术时间为(230.8±74.8)min;术中失血量为50 mL(5~400 mL);术后中位住院时间10(6~45)天;术后并发症14例(15.2%),其中吻合口漏3例,肠梗阻4例,吻合口狭窄2例,术后腹腔出血1例,尿瘘1例,肠系膜淋巴管瘘1例,腹壁切口疝1例,造口旁疝1例。10项骨盆数据中9项具有性别差异。单因素分析提示手术时间与骶尾间距(P=0.027)、坐骨棘径(P=0.044)存在相关性,术后住院时间与中骨盆前后径(P=0.007)、出口前后径(P=0.020)存在相关性。多重线性回归分析提示长骶尾间距(P=0.020)是延长手术时间的危险因素。Logistic回归分析提示短中骨盆前后径(OR=0.406,P=0.019)、长耻骨联合上下径(OR=3.432,P=0.038)是术后住院天数增加的危险因素。术后并发症、术中失血量与骨盆或相关临床数据无关。

结论

中低位直肠癌患者中,骶尾间距长、耻骨联合上下径长、中骨盆前后径短者,行腹腔镜前切除术手术难度较大。术前全面评估中低位直肠癌患者的骨盆因素可作为手术难度的评价指标。

Objective

We measured pelvic dimensions by CT scanning to explore pelvic factors affecting the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer.

Methods

This study performed a retrospective analysis on 92 patients with middle and low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision from April 2016 to May 2018. Ten pelvic factors were measured in coronal, sagittal and cross-sectional CT images. We also collected relevant clinical data of the patients. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of postoperative stay and postoperative complications were used as dependent variables to evaluate the technical difficulty of the operation. We used univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to analyze the influence factors of pelvic size and related clinical data on surgical difficulty.

Results

The mean and standard deviation of operation time of 92 patients was (230.8±74.8) min. The median and range of intraoperative blood loss was 50 (5~400) mL and lengths of postoperative stay was 10 (6~45) days; Postoperative complications were 14 patients (15.2%), including 3 patients with anastomotic fistula, four patients with intestinal obstruction, two patients with anastomotic stenosis, one patient with postoperative abdominal bleeding, one patient with urinary fistula, one patient with mesenteric lymphatic fistula, one patient with abdominal incisional hernia and one patient with paracostomy hernia. Sex differences were found in 9 pelvic data. Univariate analysis suggested that operation time was correlated with S1-to-coccyx vertical diameter (P=0.027), S1-to-S5 vertical diameter (P= 0.044); length of postoperative stay was correlated with middle pelvic anteroposterior diameter (P=0.007) and outlet anteroposterior diameter (P=0.020). Multiple linear regression analysis suggested that long S1-to-coccyx vertical diameter (P=0.02) and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (P=0.015) were factors for long operation time. Logistic regression analysis indicated short middle pelvic anteroposterior diameter (P=0.019, OR= 0.406) and long symphyseal height (P=0.038, OR=3.432) were the factors of long postoperative hospital stay. Complications and intraoperative blood loss were not correlated to the pelvic dimensions or clinical data.

Conclusions

Patients with long S1-to-coccyx vertical diameter, long symphyseal height and short middle pelvic anteroposterior diameter performed laparoscopic anterior resection more difficultly. Identification of pelvic factors in patients with low and middle rectal cancer can evaluate the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection.

图1 患者CT扫描图。1A:正中矢状位,a入口前后径;b中骨盆前后径;c出口前后径;d骶尾间距;e骶尾弧长;f骶骨上下径;i耻骨联合上下径;j耻骨尾骨径。1B:坐骨棘水平横断位,h坐骨棘间径。1C:坐骨结节水平横断位,g坐骨结节间径
表1 骨盆参数的具体定义
表2 患者人口数据与临床资料
表3 骨盆测量结果及性别差异(±s,cm)
表4 手术时间与术后住院时间单因素与多因素分析
表5 术中失血量与术后并发症单因素分析
[1]
van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2013, 14(3): 210-218.
[2]
Boller AM, Nelson H. Colon and rectal cancer: Laparoscopic or open? [J]. Clinical Cancer Research, 2007, 13(22): 6894s-6896s.
[3]
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015, 373 (14): 1324-1332.
[4]
Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(7): 767-774.
[5]
Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer [J]. Annals of Surgery, 2009, 250(1): 54-61.
[6]
Boyle KM, Petty D, Chalmers AG, et al. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer [J]. Colorectal Disease, 2005, 7(3): 232-240.
[7]
颜惠华, 楼征, 张卫, 等. 骨盆径线CT测量方法[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2011, 14(4): 291-292.
[8]
廖健南, 郭水莲, 刘展慧, 等. 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术难易程度的相关因素分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2014, 19(7): 505-508.
[9]
Veenhof AA, Engel AF, van der Peet DL, et al. Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer: a single institution pilot study [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2008, 23(5): 469-475.
[10]
Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, et al. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy [J]. Annals of Surgery, 2008, 247(4): 642-649.
[11]
Shimada T, Tsuruta M, Hasegawa H, et al. Pelvic inlet shape measured by three-dimensional pelvimetry is a predictor of the operative time in the anterior resection of rectal cancer [J]. Surgery Today, 2018, 48(1): 51-57.
[12]
Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Hata H, et al. Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: "narrow pelvis " is not a contraindication [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25(6): 1907-1912.
[13]
Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, et al. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer [J]. Surgery, 2009, 146(3): 483-489.
[14]
Wang C, Xiao Y, Qiu H, et al. Factors affecting operating time in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 12(1): 44.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[12] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[13] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要