切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05) : 491 -495. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2019.05.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜TME联合ISR对低位直肠癌的疗效及对患者控便功能的影响
魏亚元1,(), 马波1, 徐继宗1, 王冬冬1, 龚江波1, 吴相柏1   
  1. 1. 443000 湖北省宜昌市第二人民医院结直肠肛门外科(三峡大学肛肠病诊疗研究所)
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-17 出版日期:2019-10-25
  • 通信作者: 魏亚元

Effect of laparoscopic TME combined with ISR on low rectal cancer and its effect on defecation control function

Yayuan Wei1,(), Bo Ma1, Jizong Xu1, Dongdong Wang1, Jiangbo Gong1, Xiangbai Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Second People′s Hospital of Yichang City, Institute of Anorectal Diseases, Three Gorges University, Hubei 443000, China
  • Received:2018-04-17 Published:2019-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Yayuan Wei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wei Yayuan, Email:
引用本文:

魏亚元, 马波, 徐继宗, 王冬冬, 龚江波, 吴相柏. 腹腔镜TME联合ISR对低位直肠癌的疗效及对患者控便功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(05): 491-495.

Yayuan Wei, Bo Ma, Jizong Xu, Dongdong Wang, Jiangbo Gong, Xiangbai Wu. Effect of laparoscopic TME combined with ISR on low rectal cancer and its effect on defecation control function[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(05): 491-495.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下全直肠系膜切除术(TME)联合经肛门内括约肌间切除术(ISR)对低位直肠癌的治疗效果及肛门控便功能的影响。

方法

选取宜昌市第二人民医院手术治疗的低位直肠癌患者159例,收集时间为2014年1月至2017年1月,根据手术方式不同分为腹腔镜组69例(腹腔镜下TME+ISR手术)、开腹组90例(采用传统开腹手术实施TME+ISR手术治疗),对比两组的手术相关指标及术后肛门控便功能。

结果

腹腔镜组的手术时间、清扫淋巴结数目与开腹组比较差异均无统计学意义(t=1.209,1.585;P<0.05);腹腔镜组患者的手术出血量、肛门排气时间及住院时间均小于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(t=13.834,5.930,6.556;P<0.05);腹腔镜组术后肛门控便功能显著的优于开腹组,差异具有统计学意义(Z=-2.183,P=0.029);术前,两组患者的肛管收缩压(t=1.381,P=0.397)、肛管最大收缩时间(t=1.047,P=0.297)及肛管静息压(t=0.483,P=0.495)差异均无统计学意义;术后3个月,腹腔镜组患者的肛管收缩压、肛管最大收缩时间及肛管静息压显著高于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.571,5.188,3.448;P<0.05)。腹腔镜组患者手术并发症率为7.25%,显著低于开腹组患者的17.78%(χ2=4.003,P=0.045)。

结论

腹腔镜下TME联合ISR对低位直肠癌的治疗效果良好,并且具有创伤小、术后患者肛门功能恢复好的优点。

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) combined with transanal internal sphincterectomy (ISR) on the treatment of low rectal cancer and the effect of anal control function.

Methods

159 patients with low rectal cancer who were treated by Yichang Second People′s Hospital were selected. The collection time was from January 2014 to January 2017. According to the different operative methods, sixty-nine cases were divided into laparoscopic group (laparoscopic TME+ ISR operation) and ninety cases of laparotomy group (TME+ ISR operation was performed by traditional laparotomy), comparing the indicators related to the operation and operation in the two groups after anal function.

Results

The operative time and the number of dissection nodes in the laparoscopic group were not significantly different from those in the laparotomy group (t=1.209, 1.585; P>0.05). The amount of surgical bleeding, the anal exhaust time and the length of stay in the laparoscopic group were significantly less than those in the laparotomy group (t=13.834, 5.930, 6.556; P<0.05); the postoperative continence function of the laparoscopic group was significantly better than that of the laparotomy group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.183, P=0.029); before operation, the anal sphincter systolic pressure (t=1.381, P=0.397), the maximum anal contraction time (t=1.047, P=0.297), and anal rest pressure (t=0.483, P=0.495) were not significantly different between the two groups; three months after surgery, the laparoscopic group of patients with anal sphincter pressure, the maximum contraction time, anal anal resting pressure were significantly higher than that in the open group, the difference was statistically significant (t=3.571, 5.188, 3.448; P<0.05). The complication rate of the laparoscopic group was 7.25%, which was significantly lower than that of the laparotomy group 17.78% (χ2=4.003, P=0.045).

Conclusion

laparoscopic TME combined with ISR is effective in the treatment of low rectal cancer, and has less trauma and good postoperative anal function.

表1 两组患者的手术指标比较(±s
表2 两组患者的Williams标准比较[例(%)]
表3 两组患者的肛管收缩压、肛管最大收缩时间、肛管静息压比较(±s
表4 两组患者的手术并发症率比较(例)
[1]
Gu W, Wu S. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evidence based on thirteen studies [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 13(1): 1-6.
[2]
黄胜辉, 池畔, 林惠铭, 等. 腹腔镜与开放经腹括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近期疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(8): 923-927.
[3]
李丹, 庄競, 刘永刚, 等. 老年直肠癌患者腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术后吻合口瘘的相关因素[J].中国老年学, 2015, 35(15): 4302-4304.
[4]
邱辉忠, 肖毅, 徐徕, 等. 经肛门内镜联合腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除治疗低位直肠癌的安全性和可行性[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(1): 41-44.
[5]
张永康, 张剑, 廖晓锋. 腹腔镜下直肠经肛门拖出式手术与直肠前切除术治疗低位直肠癌的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(8): 736-739.
[6]
Xiong B, Ma L, Huang W, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 19(3): 516-526.
[7]
牛坚, 王月, 刘斌. 腹腔镜下直肠癌系膜全切除和盆腔自主神经的关系[J].安徽医科大学学报, 2016, 51(12): 1832-1835.
[8]
崔明明, 张宏, 刘鼎盛, 等. 低位直肠间质瘤腹腔镜辅助下的经内外括约肌间切除术[J].中国肿瘤临床, 2015, 19(5): 292-296.
[9]
徐勇超, 王刚成, 张占东, 等. 腹腔镜与开腹超低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术临床疗效的对比研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2016, 19(8): 942-943.
[10]
叶志伟, 陈远光, 胡明, 等. 直肠癌经肛内镜全直肠系膜切除术对肛门功能影响的临床研究[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24(4): 473-477.
[11]
赵日升, 汪挺. 经肛与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的短期疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 17(5): 486.
[12]
谯瞧, 车向明, 樊林. 直肠癌腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术对排尿功能的影响研究[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24(10): 1427-1432.
[13]
熊懿. 腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除术治疗中、低位直肠癌的临床疗效分析[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24(4): 616-618.
[14]
李昌荣, 李伟峰, 李红浪. 腹腔镜与开放手术行超低位直肠癌肛门括约肌间切除Meta分析[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(8): 879-883.
[15]
李想, 傅仲学, 贾诩. 腹腔镜与开腹全直肠系膜切除保肛术治疗低位直肠癌的Meta分析[J].重庆医学, 2015, 44(12): 1658-1661.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要