切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 472 -475. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2018.05.013

所属专题: 文献

经验交流

经肛吻合器直肠部分切除术治疗重度脱垂性痔病的临床研究
张正国1, 杨勇1, 杨光1,(), 梁春晖1, 李姗姗1   
  1. 1. 221009 江苏省徐州市中心医院肛肠科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-23 出版日期:2018-10-25
  • 通信作者: 杨光

Clinical research of tissue selecting therapy stapler stapled transanal rectal resection plus for severe prolapsed hemorrhoids

Zhengguo Zhang1, Yong Yang1, Guang Yang1,(), Chunhui Liang1, Shanshan Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xuzhou City Centre Hospital, Xuzhou 221009, China
  • Received:2017-05-23 Published:2018-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Guang Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Guang, Email:
引用本文:

张正国, 杨勇, 杨光, 梁春晖, 李姗姗. 经肛吻合器直肠部分切除术治疗重度脱垂性痔病的临床研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(05): 472-475.

Zhengguo Zhang, Yong Yang, Guang Yang, Chunhui Liang, Shanshan Li. Clinical research of tissue selecting therapy stapler stapled transanal rectal resection plus for severe prolapsed hemorrhoids[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(05): 472-475.

目的

评估经肛吻合器直肠部分切除术治疗重度脱垂性痔病的安全性及有效性。

方法

2013年10月至2015年4月,运用经肛吻合器直肠部分切除术治疗重度脱垂性痔病48例。记录所有患者手术相关指标、围手术期并发症、住院时间及患者满意度,判断总疗效。

结果

48例患者全部顺利完成手术,手术时间平均23.5 min;切除标本宽度平均4.8 cm、体积9.6 ml;26例术中吻合口出血行跨吻合口"8"字缝扎,平均缝扎1.7个点。术后17例出现排尿障碍,其中11例予以药物口服,6例留置导尿。术后当日疼痛评分2.5分,首次排便疼痛评分3.8分;肛门坠胀感评分2.9分;肛门控便功能,术后7天,CCF-FIS评分平均2.3分。住院时间平均7.2天。术后6个月患者满意度9.8分;随访31.3个月,无痔核脱出发生,总有效率100%。

结论

经肛吻合器直肠部分切除术治疗重度脱垂性痔病是安全、有效的。

Objective

To assess the safety, efficacy and feasibility of stapled transanal procedures performed by a new dedicated device, TST STARR Plus, in the treatment of severe prolapsed hemorrhoids.

Methods

From October 2013 to April 2015, Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. The procedure with perioperative complications, postoperative complications, the patient′s satisfaction with the efficacy of operation, and recurrence rate were reported.

Results

All patients were successfully performed in the mean of 23.5 minutes. The mean resected volume was 9.6 ml with a mean height of surgical specimen of 4.8 cm. In 26 pts, additional stitches on the suture line were needed (mean 1.7). Postoperative urinary dysfunction was reported in 17 pts, including 11 pts of oral drugs, 6 pts with indwelling catheter. Postoperative pain score of 2.5 points on the surgery day, the first defecation pain score of 3.8 points, the mean tenesmus scoring 2.9 points, CCF-FIS score mean of 2.3 points after 7 days surgery. The mean hospital stay was 7.2 days. The patient′s satisfaction with the efficacy of operation was 9.8 after 6 months, no recurrence of prolapse was reported at a median of 31.3 months after surgery.

Conclusion

TST STARR plus seems to be safe and effective in the treatment of severe prolapsed hemorrhoids.

图1 TST STARR+治疗重度脱垂痔要点。1A插入CAD查看组织脱垂情况;1B在脱垂组织最低平面(2、4、6、8、10、12点)作降落伞式荷包缝合;1C吻合器头部置入CAD内,缝合线分别从开口视窗内由带线器引出,根据痔核脱垂严重情况,从视窗内调整牵拉相应点位缝线的力度和方向,充分牵拉脱垂组织并切除;1D退出吻合器,查看脱垂组织切除情况;1E切除组织标本
[1]
Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, et al. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Arch Surg, 2009, 144(3):266-272.
[2]
王国强,刘扬,刘青, 等.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的近远期疗效及安全性的Meta分析 [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2013, 51(11):1034-1038.
[3]
Manfredelli S, Montalto G, Leonetti G, et al. Conventional (CH) vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) in surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Ten years experience [J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2012, 83(2):129-134.
[4]
Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, et al. Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trail of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy [J]. Br J Surg, 2007, 94(8):1033-1037.
[5]
姚礼庆,钟芸诗,任重. 吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术15年疗效再评估 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2012, 15(12):1211-1213.
[6]
Naldini G, Martellucci J, Talento P, et al. New approach to large haemorrhoidal prolaps: double stapled haemorrhoidopexy [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009, 24(12):1383-1387.
[7]
Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapsed: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2007, 22(3):245-251.
[8]
Naldini G, Martellucci J, Rea R, et al. Tailored prolapse surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoids and obstructed defecation syndrome with a new dedicated device: TST STARR Plus [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(5):623-629.
[9]
中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组,中华中医药学会肛肠病专业委员会,中国中西医结合学会结直肠肛门病专业委员会.痔临床诊治指南(2006版) [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2006, 9(5):461-463.
[10]
Ohana G, Myslovaty B, Ariche A, et al. Mid-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for third-and fourth-degree hemorrhoids correlation with the histological features of the resected tissue [J]. World J Surg, 2007, 31(6):1336-1342.
[11]
Raahave D, Jepsen LV, Pedersen IK. Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow-up to five years [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51(3):334-341.
[12]
Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1993, 36(1):77-97.
[13]
阮宁,陈志华,林夏冰. 选择性痔上黏膜切除术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗重度内痔的临床疗效对比 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2013, 16(7):645-647.
[14]
周春华,任华,蔡维, 等.吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术治疗重度混合痔的并发症分析 [J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2014, 13(12):964-966.
[15]
朱军,丁健华,赵克, 等. 吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术并发症分析 [J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2012, 15(12):1252-1255.
[16]
Braini A, Narisetty P, Favero A, et al. Double PPH technique for hemorrhoidal prolapse: a multicentric, prospective, and nonrandomized trial [J]. Surg Innov, 2013, 20(6):553-558.
[17]
Stuto A, Favero A, Cerullo G, et al. Double stapled haemorrhoidopexy for haemorrhoidal prolapse: indications, feasibility and safety [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(7):386-389.
[18]
Favreau C, Siproudhis L, Eleouet M, et al. Underlying functional bowel disorder may explain patient dissatisfaction after haemorrhoidal surgery [J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(3):356-361.
[19]
Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, et al. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy [J]. Lancet, 2000, 356(9231):730-733.
[20]
Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I, et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007, 50(2):204-212.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 廖玥, 王可, 秦江月, 吴艳秋, 陈俊, 汪涛, 文富强, 王浩. 丹龙口服液治疗轻中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的多中心及前瞻性研究[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 306-311.
[3] 王勋, 石荣, 王菁. 新型可自由选择调节开环的痔上黏膜手术暴露辅助器械在痔吻合器手术中应用的临床疗效研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 319-325.
[4] 刘有才, 张义君, 赵欣磊, 周家玄. Endobutton带袢钛板与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位病例的疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 212-217.
[5] 黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 王磊, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤临床观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 218-223.
[6] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[7] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[8] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[9] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[10] 董骏, 吴芳芳. mFOLFOX6与FOLFOX4化疗方案治疗直肠癌的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[11] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[12] 于晓东, 李德华, 高山, 徐鑫. 理中汤加味联合美沙拉嗪治疗轻度活动期克罗恩病的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-202.
[13] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
[14] 高英杰, 王阳, 王丽红, 毕文静, 刘卫民. VWF基因突变导致混合痔术后大出血一例报告并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 496-498.
[15] 范勇, 张利昉, 杨美琳. 改良经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 65-68.
阅读次数
全文


摘要