切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华结直肠疾病电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01) : 37 -40. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2017.01.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同剂量奥沙利铂联合替吉奥方案对晚期胃癌患者血小板的影响
屈涛1, 杨林1, 张弘纲1, 崔成旭1,()   
  1. 1. 100021 北京,国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院内科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-21 出版日期:2017-02-25
  • 通信作者: 崔成旭

The efficacy of different dosages of oxaliplatin plus S-1 on thrombocytopenia for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Tao Qu1, Lin Yang1, Honggang Zhang1, Chengxu Cui1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
  • Received:2016-11-21 Published:2017-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Chengxu Cui
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cui Chengxu, Email:
引用本文:

屈涛, 杨林, 张弘纲, 崔成旭. 不同剂量奥沙利铂联合替吉奥方案对晚期胃癌患者血小板的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017, 06(01): 37-40.

Tao Qu, Lin Yang, Honggang Zhang, Chengxu Cui. The efficacy of different dosages of oxaliplatin plus S-1 on thrombocytopenia for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2017, 06(01): 37-40.

目的

研究不同剂量奥沙利铂联合替吉奥对晚期胃癌患者化疗所致血小板减少的影响。

方法

选取2014年8月至2016年5月在国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院内科收治的60例经病理诊断为晚期胃癌的患者,分为2组。A组患者SOX方案奥沙利铂给药剂量为100 mg/m2,B组患者SOX方案奥沙利铂给药剂量为130 mg/m2,其他相同。依据NCI-CTC 3.0版毒性分级标准对两组患者的不良反应进行观察和分级。采用SPSS 19.0软件进行统计分析,组间比较采用卡方检验。

结果

SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌出现3/4度不良反应主要有贫血、白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、恶心及呕吐。A组3/4度血小板减少症发生比例6.67%,显著低于B组发生比例30.0%。影响血小板减少的因素包括奥沙利铂剂量[OR=3.846,95%CI(1.091~13.56),P=0.0286)]。

结论

奥沙利铂剂量是影响SOX方案治疗晚期胃癌所致血小板减少的因素。

Objective

To study the efficacy of different dosages of oxaliplatin plus S-1 on thrombocytopenia for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Between August 2014 and May 2016, a total of 60 advanced gastric cancer patients at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College were recruited to the study, and divided into two groups. Arm A received oxaliplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m2 and arm B receiving oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m2, started with SOX therapy. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0. This study used SPSS 19.0 software to undertake statistical analysis. Comparison of groups was statistically analyzed with X2 test. Two-sided P<0.05 was used to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

In total, the most common grade 3/4 toxicities were anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting in the treatment of SOX therapy for advanced gastric cancer. The incidence ofgrade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in arm A was 6.67%, which was significantly lower in arm B with 30.0%. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was significantly associated with the dose of oxaliplatin [OR=3.846, 95%CI (1.091~13.56), P=0.0286) ].

Conclusions

The dose of oxaliplatin was one of the factors which affected affects grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in the treatment of SOX therapy for advanced gastric cancer patients.

表1 A组与B组3/4度血小板减少症比较(例,%)
表2 单因素分析影响血小板的因素
[1]
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians [J]. 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
[2]
孙秀娣,牧人,周有尚, 等. 中国胃癌死亡率20年变化情况分析及其发展趋势预测 [J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2004, 26(1): 4-9.
[3]
Cunningham D, Okines AF, Ashley S.Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastriccancer [J]. The New England journal of medicine, 2010, 362(9): 858-859.
[4]
Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, et al.Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial [J]. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO, 2009, 20(4): 666-673.
[5]
Wilson H, Lehky T, Thcmas RR, et al. Acute oxaliplatin-inducedperipheral nerve hyperexcitability [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(7): 1767-1774.
[6]
Cunningham, D. MD, Rao S., Starling N., et al. Randomisedmulticentre phase III study comparing capecitabine with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin with cisplatin in patien TYMS with advanced oesophagogastric (OG) cancer: The REAL 2 trial [J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: LBA4017.
[7]
Koizumi W, Takiuchi H, Yamada Y., et al.Phase II study of oxaliplatin plus S-1 as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (G-SOX study) [J]. Annals of oncology, 21(5): 1001-1005.
[8]
Hildebrandt MA, Gu J, Wu X. Pharmacogenomics of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC [J]. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol, 2009, 5(7): 745-755.
[9]
Stoehlmacher J, Ghaderi V, Iobal S, et al. A polymorphism of the XRCC1 gene predicts for response to platinum based treatment in advanced colorectal cancer [J]. Anticancer Res, 2001, 21(4B): 3075-3079.
[10]
Park CJ, Choi BS. The Protein shuffle. Sequential interactions among components of the human nucleotide excision repair pathway [J]. FEBS J, 2006, 273(8): 1600-1608.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[3] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[4] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[12] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[13] 吴天宇, 刘子璇, 杨浦鑫, 贾思明, 丁凯, 程晓东, 李泳龙, 陈伟, 吕红芝, 张奇. 腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 379-384.
[14] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[15] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?